AIG Bailout & Bank Profitability: Apparently the AIG bailout accounted for a non-trivial portion of banks’ recent profits.
Ammo Shortage: Obama’s election = bull market for ammunition
Killer Plasma Storm: Sol behaving badly.
Feasibility of Energy Independence: About what I figured – technically, but not politically, possible.
China & RMB Loans: Hopefully we’ll continue borrowing from them in dollars.
Rising FHA Defaults: A worrisome trend.
Health Care Reform: Emanuel the younger favors “a plan to scrap Medicare, Medicaid and employer-based health insurance in favor of vouchers that people could use to purchase coverage.” Interesting.
Housing Vacancy Stuff: Banks’ propensity to “walk away” from FC’s is apparently greatly exaggerated.
Financial Crisis: US v. Japan:
The possibility that we might be repeating Japan’s recent “Lost Decade” is unnerving.
Military virtue: http://www.jerrypournelle.com/reports/jerryp/virtue.html
European Free-Riding: “We pay for [Europe’s] military protection, we pay for the profits that develop the drugs and consumer goods they happily consume, and now we’re supposed to pay for their economic bailout too.”
Reverse Redlining Debunked:
Fed Facilities & Credit Allocation:
Even if one accepts Altrig’s explanation of the Fed’s motivations in creating these new credit facilities, the fact remains that they’re (effectively) engaging in the process of credit allocation by engineering policy to lower rates normally set by the private sector. If that sector’s processes for setting such rates is disrupted by “dysfunctions in markets”, the proper solution is to fix the root causes of those dysfunctions. E.g., fix the financial system, killing off zombie banks, possibly governmental CDS. By contrast, the Fed’s policy of “brick breaking” is, effectively, putting a band-aid over the aforementioned problems. While (at best – at worst it keeps zombies on life support) this policy basically buys time for the financial sector to heal itself, by allowing the rest of the private sector to continue functioning even in the face of financial-sector dysfunction, the price of such massive Fed intervention is that private actors become accustomed to the existence of such interventions, to the point where they have a vested interest in keeping such interventions going indefinitely. Such a massive & fundamental intertwining of a government agency (i.e., the Fed) with the financial sector may eventually result in the former becoming a conduit for politicizing the latter’s business decisions. In particular, how long before politicians attempt to transform this newfound Fed power (to directly set formerly-private interest-rate spreads) into another conduit for B&C?
Nazi Fiscal Stimulus:
Taking Politics Too Seriously:
The burden of being Rush Limbaugh’s relative.
Battery Offshoring: “[A]dvanced battery manufacturing is almost entirely overseas, particularly in Asia.” Worrisome.
Given the existence of an impaired financial system, credit easing was probably necessary to avoid an even more severe downturn. However, my preference would’ve been to fix the root cause – i.e., fix the financial system, so as to restore private willingness to lend thereto – rather than keep zombie banks on life support for years to come. Admittedly, the latter course of action (which basically amounts to forbearance & the like) may work, if the banks lend prudently. My concern is that that they won’t (whether due to bad management or politicized lending). S&Ls abused forbearance to make even more risky loans in a vain attempt to earn their way out of insolvency.
Recession & Free Cash Flow
Plausibility of Artificial Intelligence
Welfare Islands Watch, Brazilian Edition
FDIC Takeover Tactics